Hacker News Reader

Comment by haldean | Hacker News Reader

If you're going on population, San Jose is the biggest city in the Bay Area; in that sense, it makes sense to pick it as the "one that wins" in a very dense area. Calgary is around 1M people and Tijuana is 1.3M, while Seattle and Vancouver are each around 600k. Those choices seem pretty reasonable to me.

View on HN

In the context of a zoomed out global map it would seem to make more sense to approach it by Metro area. Vancouver metro area is 2.5M vs Calgary's 1.2M. Seattle is 3.6M

Also, I would think national capitals should be included where possible.

Alas, it's an early beta.

But you shouldn't just pick it based on some statistical measure only. Maps are supposed to be a useful tool, and that should consider the cultural importance of a place.

Is the e in San Jose, California really accented? (It shows up as San José for me.)

It's optional I suppose. I'm not aware of any official city documents that use it, but it has historical roots.

> California Governor Felipe de Neve established the first civilian town or pueblo in California on November 29, 1777. Founded near the southern end of San Francisco Bay, it was christened El Pueblo de San José de Guadalupe.

[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20080218051828/http://www.califor...

The official website seems to use the accent when the city name's is written in regular running text, but not when it's in all-caps or small-caps (as in the logo): http://www.sanjoseca.gov/

That used to be an unofficial convention of the Spanish language regarding accented letters: only in minuscule text but not on majuscule (capital) text. The Royal Academy has always supported (since at least 1792) that majuscules should be accented, but it was difficult to do so since movable types and typewriters didn't allow room for them: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Acento_e...

San Jose is bigger than San Francisco only because its city limits occupy far more area. San Francisco is a bigger population center.

…do you live in San Francisco?

I do. How can I help you? :)

>San Francisco

>Population

>City and county 852,469

>Metro 4,594,060

>CSA 8,607,423

>San Jose

>Population

>City 1,015,785

>Metro 1,952,872

>CSA 8,607,423

Colloquially, "population" refers to either the metropolitan area population or the CSA population, or something in between. But since different countries have different concepts and definitions for "metro area", it can't be relied on for a global map. The only thing remotely portable in this case is "how many people live within the city limits". And by that measure, San Jose is indeed bigger than San Francisco. San Francisco doesn't even get a mention because its population within city limits is below one million - the cut-off line.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Jose,_California

It sounds like you argue that because San Jose is bigger both by territory and by population, somehow that makes San Francisco truly bigger. However, if it's bigger in both, it only makes sense the map algorithm chooses it to display on lower resolutions. I don't think going by population density is that common.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com