Hacker News Reader

Comment by cvburgess | Hacker News Reader

A lot of libraries have been following the iojs track (v1, v2, v3) so many libraries are already in place to support v4 out of the box. The best way to know though is test your specific packages in a dev branch or sandbox environment and see what breaks - tests help automate this if you have them!

View on HN

webpack-dev certainly does not work.

socket.io is a big deal, and it breaks on 4.0.

I've not tried 4.1

If possible, consider leaving socket.io.

If you can, check out https://github.com/websockets/ws .

Doesn't seem to have a fallback mechanism, which is pretty important considering the number of users behind proxies that don't support web sockets... of course this depends on your user base.

Never heard of it. Thanks!

I'll take a look at this. I only recently started using socket.io in my express site, so I'm not too deep down the rabbit hole. It seems to have close to the same syntax.

Any reason why you support ws over socket.io?

Socket.io is kinda big, the documentation is not great, there's a lot of baggage there from it's history, etc.

ws is faster, and most browsers now support web sockets properly.

If you want some isolation, there are various shim layers that are available.

socket.io and ws are apples to oranges. ws does not provide hand-shaking, retries or fallbacks. These are important things if you're building a production app.

Consider using Primus [1] instead of socket.io, backed with either ws or sockjs.

[1] https://github.com/primus/primus

Reply on news.ycombinator.com