What plan of action are you recommending here? And how does it differ from your plan for any person of equivalent IQ from other groups?
If IQ is that important, why use an unreliable, socially constructed grouping instead of measuring it directly?
If IQ is that important, why use an unreliable, socially constructed grouping instead of measuring it directly?
I do know that we predicate school funding and a lot of other education/social policies on "bridging the achievement gap" and maybe this should be re-examined.