If blacks are more likely to come into contact with whites than the reverse then it would follow that blacks are more likely to be killed by whites than whites are by blacks.
It would be a mischaracterization to imply one is extremely low, while the other is much higher. They are both, comparably, very low.
Particularly when you take variance and margin of error into account.
With such a tight range, I would wager one could only definitely claim they were probably approximately within a percent or two at best.