2010 Google Trends for python, ruby, and php
google.com
google.com
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=31&q=python%2...
Possibly comparing a search that is about what a real user could type into the search engine is more accurate, and filters out other stuff like all the search for "Python" as animal.
Edit: btw using "hash" instead of "array" changes the results a lot: http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=31&q=python%2...
I tested by comparing the results for "ruby" and "rails". The curves were virtually identical, which would be impossible if there were very much noise in the results for either term.
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=31&q=ruby%2Cr...
There's still a strong correlation among the three queries.
(Ruby's docs improved when Programming Ruby was first written but since then I haven't noticed any significant effort to further improve them. I reach for one of my Programming Ruby books or PDFs before going to http://ruby-lang.org , might just be me but I doubt it!)
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=31&q=django%2...
I always wondered why Python consistently ranks higher than Ruby outside of the webapp sphere. Could it be the scientific/academic community's interest in Python's superior number crunching?
It ranks the top 20 languages. Subtitle: "December Headline: All time highs for C#, Objective-C and ActionScript"
"foo developer"
Look at how Java is in decline. Also, check the map to see where most queries for Java and PHP come from.