Ad Blocking Will Keep Growing Until We Make Ads Better
adexchanger.com
adexchanger.com
Speaking of spam, advertisers should adopt opt-in policies and avoid confusing "gotcha" phrasing. Things like having a large "Download" button that goes to the paid signup page, while the actual file download link is a tiny plain text link you have to scroll down to find. Stop that. It's deceptive and if done in a physical store would get you sued for fraud.
Except I really don't expect advertisers to do any of these things because they're not interested in making the viewer happy, they want to make their customers happy and that means getting as many people to "accidentally" click on their ads as possible. I'm sure they've done AB testing and heatmaps that prove playing nice is not profitable.
It is promising to see the industry look at ways to self-regulate before something drastic happens. i.e. doomed government attempts to regulate, or more sophisticated ad-blocking that continues to destroy the business model.
TFA lays out ways to make advertising more humane for viewers, but I am curious how aware or involved with technical approaches like VRM or Kantara Initiative's User-Managed Access (UMA) to making permission-based advertising more feasible. In the past year I bought two new high ticket items--a new car and a new laptop. I had to do two phase of research for each of them--what is even out there as far as features and then who offers the features I think are interesting. I would expect that a highly qualified lead would have made any advertising much more lucrative during either of those phases (advertising that I would have actually welcomed) than a bunch of simple broadcast ad views (which I mostly blocked anyway). I would love to see advertisers and browser developers work with groups like those to make advertising not just less obnoxious but something that I could actively consider useful.
it seems to me that once people see the benefits of the blockers, there's almost no chance of getting them to go back