Visualizing machine learning
r2d3.us
r2d3.us
But it makes it _so_ hard to bookmark something in your mind, or to skip back to something, or to view an infographic in the context of the next or previous paragraph, or any number of things that have been easy to do with text and images for thousands of years. Trying to change the text size in the hope that you can just view more text breaks everything.
I find it really affects my overall comprehension of a piece, and the speed with which I can get through it. Given the universally positive comments elsewhere, I assume my brain is just wired for the dark ages.
Allow me to define "web page" as an HTML document optionally enhanced with CSS and JS and "web presentation" as an experience delivered over the web but which fundamentally cannot be rendered as a static document.
"No, I can't explain the dance to you; If I could say it I wouldn't have to dance it." ~Isadora Duncan
As much as I like and enjoy well-made "web presentations" I feel wary of the high praise that doesn't take into account the points you raise above. These things can get away from people. Look how easily light-grey body text swept through the web.
As cool as this is, it's still a far cry from e.g. Alan Kay's "active documents" and it's not really a "web site" (IMO).
I would add, as useful resource, this full course on Amazon Machine Learning: https://cloudacademy.com/amazon-web-services/courses/amazon-...
I think the title promises too much though (I realize that it is probably meant as an overall title for series of posts). There is no machine learning in this presentation, no algorithms for discovering the splits are described so the machine doesn't learn anything.
To find the X dimension for one of the 7 scatterplots in that triangle thing put your mouse on the scatterplot you want and move down till you hit some text, that's the X axis. The Y axis is to the left.
So a scatterplot matrix, a splom, displays those 21 scatterplots in a meaningful way. Each "row" and "column" of scatterplots compares a single dimension against all of the others.
You usually look at a thing like this to see if you'll get lucky and find a good "orthogonal" comparator—in other words, that just two normal, human-interpretable dimensions already form a good splitting plane like "elevation cross $/sq-ft" does in the running example.
Thanks for the explanation!