About 15 years after, I found myself in a plane about to land in LA for the first time, with my face pressed to the window and thinking to myself: "LA is like the f* SimCity!!"
About 15 years after, I found myself in a plane about to land in LA for the first time, with my face pressed to the window and thinking to myself: "LA is like the f* SimCity!!"
When I came to the US, particularly the towns that aren't by the coast, I thought SimCity! Apart from things being on a grid, there's also quite a lot of repetitive architecture. Schools look similar, utilities look similar, neighbourhoods are filled with the same houses. And all the big box stores are exact copies.
I really want to try out this radial city though!!
I have always been fascinated by other cities when a road starts to curve or a square pops out of nowhere. Walking through London is much more interesting than it was in Milan.
In particular Siena, which has detailed squares for trade, politics, full of simbolic features (e.g. the City Hall tower was built much higher than the church's to assure the government is perceived as superior).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siena#/media/File:PiazzadelCam...
My home city is Barcelona where, actually, a big part is designed as an orthogonal grid.... but it's still not the same. I think I would have enjoyed the game more if I knew how my cities were supposed to look like.
Off the top of my head I cannot think of a single city with a square structure, or where castrum and decuman still exist[0].
[0] i.e. Manchester https://www.google.hu/maps/place/Manchester,+UK/@53.479099,-... does not look square at all, even though the "-chester" part derives from "castrum" and there is something resembling a cross in part of it.
Nothing to do with the romans, or with normal maltese city architecture (which is much more organic)
Mannheim comes to mind: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/49.4877/8.4640
Karlsruhe is listed as an example in the Book, although considerably less regular than most US cities I've been to: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/62518#map=15/49.0064/8...
then you have places like Turin that were built with a ruler [2]
https://www.google.it/maps/place/Via+Camillo+Benso+Cavour,+3...
https://www.google.it/maps/place/Turin,+Metropolitan+City+of...
edit: some more samples, with cardo/decumano marked when known
naples https://www.google.it/maps/place/Naples,+Metropolitan+City+o...
parma (barely visible, linked plaza was the old forum) https://www.google.it/maps/place/Piazza+Giuseppe+Garibaldi,+...
verona https://www.google.it/maps/place/Via+Rosa,+7,+37121+Verona+V...
firenze, you can even see the old walls
https://www.google.it/maps/place/Piazza+della+Repubblica,+10...
But as far as I know naples is not even a roman city, so I don't know what is going on there :)
In terms of town planning, I'd probably call anything 20th century "really new", and "new" being anything from the Industrial Revolution onwards.
Therefore, I'd claim New Town isn't new, yet alone really new.
Maybe you where referring to Turin? (that has this exact square layout that makes me mad and lost sometimes - because nearby streets all seem the same)
I live in one of the high-tax places, earn well above average and do no tax planning. Yet, what the taxman actually charges me is only half the nominal maximum.
Although some of the national tax goes back to the councils and some of the national taxes pay for the infrastructure, so it's a bit more complicated than that.