Microsoft's Software is Malware
gnu.org
gnu.org
But the FSF's usual warlike tone against anything not free software creeps in here heavily, and sours the validity of the article.
I have an elderly relative who just upgraded to Windows 10. As things stand right now, she doesn't have any problems with her computer. She doesn't have any problem with the fact that you have to upgrade periodically to enjoy new features and better usability. The only reason I know about this at all is because she brought it up at dinner, to remark about how easy it was to install and how much better she likes over the last version. (As a perfectly content Mac user, I didn't know what to say, aside from "that's great!")
When reading FSF/GNU agitprop, I can't help but imagine the disaster that would follow if someone were to replace Windows with pure GNU software on her computer (or OS X on mine). If malware is software that does you harm, GNU software is malware for everyone that is happy with the non-GNU software they've chosen.
Does that include the MIT licenced software made by MS too, the Apache licensed?
Like the extremist they are GNU are using absolutes.