Things We Still Don’t Know About Water
nautil.us
nautil.us
Question: Why do some articles get (2014) etc, but articles from months before don't get a designator?
Sounds like a possible source of random entropy for crypto :-) I did the Wolfram Alpha query[1] and it turns out that 100 molecules of water has a volume of 2.992 yL (yoctoliters, 10^-24 L). I didn't think we were up to yocto-technology yet! The paper that seems to describe this is called "Evidence of a new quantum state of nano-confined water"[2] so I have a feeling that "a few hundred molecules" may be a few orders of magnitude out.
From the paper:
"We find that in water confined on scales of 20˚A, this wave function responds to the details of the confinement, corresponds to a strongly anharmonic local potential, shows evidence in some cases of coherent delocalization in double wells, and involves changes in zero point kinetic energy of the protons from -40 to +120 meV difference from that of bulk water at room temperature. This behavior appears to be a generic feature of nanoscale confinement."
It's a really interesting paper. (although I had to do a lot of Wikipedia searches on certain terminology!)
[1]: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=volume+of+100+molecules...
And you support quality journalism.
Noticed it was on sale, so I just picked up a two-year subscription. Suggest others do the same. Well worth it.
As an aside, I would also be willing to pay a _lot_ more for the quarterly, like 100-to-200% increase.
Though maybe the dragons are taking down notes and have little first aid kits and stuff, so homeopathy might just be one of their dragon hobbies, or something. Would also explain the lack of support for homeopathy in large scale studies, as obviously dragons know if it is just an experiment.