Why does everyone point to Zen as such a significant work? I've tried to read it on 3 separate occasions now, and I'm not "getting it". I'm fully willing to be completely wrong about this, but it frustrates me that Pirsig focuses so much on what I read as "the absolute value of quality" when - IMHO, it's merely a relative term.
I get the point he's making early in the book about "doing it yourself" vs "buying it", but as the book goes on I get more and more frustrated with what appears to me to be the central premise.
Can you point me to a "guide to reading 'Zen'" or something similar which can show me where I'm going wrong?
Edit: I'm getting down-voted so let me put a fine point on it. Reading a book is a pretty low risk commitment. You could be reading dozens of a books a year. The book we are talking about is considered to be a "great American novel" and less risky still. No one should have to convince you to finish it. If you don't like it enough to finish it, then don't bother. http://www.modernlibrary.com/top-100/100-best-novels/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xg5O0l7ybY
(specifically the quote about playing music)
"Guidebook to Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance":
http://www.amazon.com/Guidebook-Zen-Art-Motorcycle-Maintenan...
Both Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance and the Guidebook are highly recommended. Just read.
There's a few insights to be taken from the book but I largely agree with you that after reading it a few times, it's not worth the praise that it gets.