4-5 was a very long time ago in graph db time :) neo4j and its competitors have changed the lot!!
While neo4j has it's proponents. The lack of standards support means that as a data provider it's hard to support.
While neo4j has it's proponents. The lack of standards support means that as a data provider it's hard to support.
Then for our end users, we would need to hack in a namespace convention to avoid issues when integrating our data.
Then TinkerPop misses the SERVICE concept for federated querying in SPARQL1.1, which is essential for our endusers who do knowledge discovery (i.e. small biology labs without the inhouse capability of running their own large databases).