“Nerd” and “Geek” Should Be Banned, Professor Says
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
I wonder how much credibility we should give to a Psychologist who suggests banishing a language term for a field he is not part of?
By the time the derogatory terms for a group have become in-your-face badges of pride, your "scene" will have become a kind of herd overrun with fractionally clueless imitators, who don't deeply understand the subculture. Many of these newcomers are really only seeking a new territory for staking out social dominance signals of "cool." Shops and websites catering to the lifestyle soon appear. The "scene" has transformed into a bloated, cancerous cargo-cult caricature of itself.
The faithful and true anxiously await the upcoming implosion, where the "cool" goes away, taking with it all of the pretenders. Sometimes, that day never comes.
But a geek is just someone who has unusually strong interests in a subject, activity or occupation. COmputers, cars, film, fashion, politics, math, celebrities, etc. You can geek out on anything. Doesn't make you a bad person, or a social pariah. You can be a very social, likable person, and be a complete obsessive geek. You just have to know when to shut up about it.
By now, Nerd isn't used and Geek changed its meaning to be more of a positive thing - at least in my age-group.
I guess if more people stood for their Geekdom, this could happen in other places of the world too.