Online Development Studio - CodeRun
coderun.com
coderun.com
1. My development machine, being a notebook, is always too slow. Being in the "cloud" this could be fast enough for building and deploying.
2. My internet connection at home is too slow for fast turnaround (1 mbit/s). With this I would not have have to upload the built packages to the deployment machine. Assuming the IDE runs on the deployment machine.
As a Java developer (most of the time) I would need this to be a Java IDE though. :-) But there is no reason that this would be impossible.
When my teachers learn that everything I turn in I do it in class, and not from home, they are genuinely surprised that I am able to do things well and on-time. With this, I can do some work on my netbook, download it at the labs, and keep working from there.
@romland: it is on our TODO ;) The IDE will be open sourced soon on http://coderun.codeplex.com/
@caduardo21: we've created CodeRun IDE with a C#/JavaScript converter named SharpKit. Check it out on http://www.coderun.com/sharpkit/
this too will soon be open source
@biotech, @nailer: Vote for your favourite language: Python: http://coderun.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=94...
Ruby: http://coderun.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=94...
Perl: http://coderun.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=97...
@dotBen: jmonegro's answer hits the spot. Sorry it wasn't clear enough on the website. We'll work on it.
@vyrotek: F5 is a real pain. I hear ya. Maybe Html6 will let us take control over the function keys.
We'd love to hear more! Feel free to ask or suggest anything.
Cheers,
Gilad
I did find it difficult to resist right-clicking things or hitting F5 to build.
But, in the end I'm not sure I can find a reason to leave the real Visual Studio.
What intrigued me was the menu-item saying "Open Source" -- was almost the first thing I clicked on, but it seems that the actual IDE is not open source; it was the components that can be inserted into the actual IDE.
I imagine one thing that is is pretty high on the TODO list of the author is to replace the Visual Studio icons, though. Or perhaps MS is forgiving about these things. :-)
Will bookmark and return.
Etherpad (now open source, as it happens) was great for this - but lacked IDE options. SubEtherEdit/Coda is also fab on Mac, but not everyone has Mac or is on same network subnet.
If they got multiple authoring into this, (and Pyhton + Ruby) for me it would be a serious contender.
Open source is great when it's running on your own equipment cos you know who's picking up the running costs (you).
Clearly this product will need resource to run and scale with growth and I would want to know how they company intends to pay for this. If it works I don't mind paying for something like this like I do BaseCamp, CampFire, GitHub - but would want to know what it might look like upfront.
I think they really have something here, if they had Ruby support I'd jump on it: it reminds me of Heroku (garden) when it was a web based Rails IDE, but this seems just a bit better performing, at least from my end.
I had a peek at the javascript source code :) Is there a reason why you are not compressing it?
Overall congratulations and good luck!
if this thing can do things better and more intuitively than phpanywhere, i might actually use it.
I was impressed with the Heroku editor when it first came out, but this is in another league. Seriously well done.