Markdown and LaTeX Editor

+1 for RMarkdown and editR. The best thing about RMarkdown is the ability to do calculations in R and use those variables within LaTeX. A simple example:

  ```{r}
  a = 3
  b = 6
  c = a / b
  ```

  Did you know that $\frac{`r a`}{`r b`} = `r c`$?

http://i.imgur.com/IpiqDEx.png

I just watched your video and I think your tool is exactly what I'm looking for! Downloading it now.

In the meantime, I was wondering if you ever compose on your iPad? What is your workflow for that?

Is the HTML generation with backlinks from an external lib or custom built for softcover? I'm working on a CMS and this would be fantastic to use as a module for writing articles.

That's seriously cool.

Had I had something like that some years ago, my workflow for both my BSc and my MSc thesis would have been quite different.

When it comes to Markdown its main advantage is not its features (it does not have many), but its simplicity (and ability to edit it in a text editor - blazing fast, no distractions, etc). And then I can convert it to anything.

Vs LaTeX - sometimes I need just to note (a to do list, a draft of a blog post, an outline of workshop), without the boilerplate or visual noise of LaTeX.

(And I wrote more than a dozen of papers in LaTeX - so mine argument isn't "LaTeX is too hard".)

That said, I enjoyed using Overleaf - but mainly for teaching LaTeX (no installation, very nice and readable error messages, nice examples (I use your default page as the first introduction)). But for anything longer it's a pain that everything needs to recompile every few keystrokes (especially on a slow connection); I know it's not you but LaTeX; but for the same reason sometimes (when not requiring full features of LaTeX) it's easier to use Markdown + MathJaX.

I'm another Markdown regular. It's my preferred markup language for online sites (Reddit, StackExchange, Elllo), and the results with only modest site styling are quite impressive (Ello looks _markedly_ better with modified CSS). Sites _without_ Markdown (such as HN) drive me nuts as I'm always tossing in Markdown code and realising (after the edit window's expired) that I effed up....

I've used vi/vim since the late 1980s, it's drilled into my finger-memory (I'm composing it now in an external editor).

I also know HTML and LaTeX (having picked up the latter fairly recently), and have used a few other markup languages (nroff/groff, DocBook, etc.).

What's great about Markdown is that it's close to a 99% solution. I'm usually authoring into HTM or PDF, and if necessary, I'll generate HTML or LaTeX and finish up with either for detail work. With a full-featured Markdown parser though, there's little that cannot be accomplished, short of equations. Online implementations have various annoying omissions -- Reddit doesn't support images or subscripts, Ello lacks blockquotes. Neither has footnotes. Otherwise, it's fairly complete.

While LaTeX is actually pretty lightweight for prose (once I grokked it, surprisingly so), Markdown's lighter. And not having to pair up open/close tags makes it much lighter-weight than HTML.

I love TeX and LaTex. I've been using TeX even before LaTeX was available. However, I barely use it any more and write most documents in Markdown.

To turn your question upside down, the reason I don't use TeX and LaTeX any more (despite being quite invested in it) is that I rarely care about the quality of output any more. I'm more interested in the text editor representation.

For the types of documents I write (about software, very rarely doing any math) Markdown's syntax is just simpler and quicker. It produces readable HTML output with code syntax highlighting. That's all I want.

If I need to typeset something, I will go back to TeX/LaTeX. I'm afraid, though, that I'm not a good fit for overleaf as I am already invested in the concept of splitting composition from presentation. When I am writing, I specifically don't care about (and would rather not have) anything showing me what the final output is going to look like.

Typesetting is a completely different process for me. Once I have a good portion of the document written (sometimes all of it), then I will start looking at presentation. I'm also one of the crazy people who writes his own styles in TeX ;-)

What's interesting is that the last time I used LaTeX, I actually wrote my own markup language (similar to markdown) and had a build step that would convert it to LaTeX. This was because I was doing a lot of writing with very weird formatting (non-standard output of furigana in Japanese where I displayed both the Chinese characters, the Japanese reading of the characters, and the romanization of that reading). Doing that with TeX macros would have worn my fingers off.

So I suppose to sum up, since I don't need precise typesetting in most of my documents, Markdown is "good enough" and it is easier to type. When I do need precise typesetting, TeX/LaTeX is what I go for, but even then I would rather write in a markdown style DSL and translate to TeX which I can output. As much as I love TeX, it really does suck compared to any modern macro language. LaTeX gives a semi-nice veneer, but it still isn't optimal. Pushing it off to one side is how I cope ;-)

I taught myself LaTeX to be able to write academic papers. It was invaluable in teaching me about a large part of the document processing ecosystem I knew nothing about and made me appreciate that WYSIWYG was a step backwards to some degree.

Strangely enough though for the current paper I have to write (> 20,000 but < 40,000 words) I have decided to see how far I can get with Markdown, Pandoc, and a lightweight custom pipeline. I'm going on a hunch but I have the feeling that this will work out ok. I may be wrong. Pandoc will auto-gen a table of contents from the Markdown headers. I'm going to try and grab citations straight from Zotero. AnnotateJS will give me endnotes but also allow others to make annotations and I should be able to generate HTML5+RDFa for semantic annotation. And yes, PDF because the university requires it -- I think I'll be able to go to PDF via LaTeX with Pandoc. Markdown does blockquotes too. I don't need complex Math, but I will need notation for propositional/predicate calculus. There really aren't that many _elements_ in an academic paper when you break it down to its constituent components and Markdown+extensions seems to have it all covered.

Pollen, which featured here recently, looks interesting too and I'm going to investigate that.

Edit: I've used Overleaf (and love it!) and even demo'd it to others and I think it's a great product. Scrivener is doing interesting things as well.

I have a content platform (medical app) where our clients create or upload a significant percentage of the content.

Although markdown has its limitations, as well as a barrier to entry for the non-technical user, it enables us to make sure our content is uniform in appearance with minimal style guides. A good markdown table editor would be a real winner, and some f the better open source editors don't have a consistent set of features, so it is often s bit of a trade off determining what is best.

I use it very regular at work to document projects we are developing or to document software/practices at work. For my personal blog it is also my preferred syntax to edit articles. It is easy and very quick to pick-up.

I seldom need to switch to something else or it should be to design diagrams or imagery. Even code - using extensions to highlight stuff - works relatively well. The only thing I dislike is the table stuff which for me always involves some fiddling.

But to be perfectly honest I'm also thinking of looking into latex. I also use pandoc to convert my markdown files to PDF which uses latex templates if I’m not mistaken. For me personally it works and looks great but the company has invested a lot of resources in branding and creating some-kind of corporate identity.

So now they want all the documentation including the fancy headers/footers and I think the only way of inserting it with pandoc involves creating a latex template and using the fancyhdr (off the top of my head so I could be wrong) package. Definitely something that I need to look into.

I used Overleaf to write my most recent paper, as it is incredibly useful for collaborating on documents. I think the coauthor was similarly impressed. I've never used Markdown (in fact this is the first I've heard of it) and always write in full Latex. There are a lot of equations involved, and I like to use some of the fine control that Latex gives you over the formatting. Plus, everyone in my field is expected to know Latex.

I'm writing my PhD dissertation in Markdown. It's killer feature (for me) is that a) it converts to a plethora of different formats (including Latex and Word) via Pandoc, b) it works well with version control, and c) Pandoc filters let me do an almost unlimited amount of automated preprocessing on the document with simple scripting.

I use markdown regularly for writing documentation. I've decided to never touch LaTeX as long as I can until someone writes an implementation with non-useless error messages.

This webpage on whatever backwoods Russian server he is using seems a lot snappier though...

Atom is too slow. I use sublime text with markdown preview.

I run the ShareLaTeX open-source version and it renders a PDF each time I want to see the changes I made. With ShareLaTeX I can exactly see how the end product will look, something you can't do with this app. It's much less responsive, but having a PDF is a bigger advantage to me.

Looks like it compiles the Markdown locally but for LaTeX it sends each source snippet to their server to compile: http://tex.s2cms.ru

It appears to be (realtime) server rendered svg.

The most of "standard" latex features and some packages. You can find details here: https://tex.s2cms.com/

Does this also do a subset of LaTeX, or is it the whole thing?

Please don't downvote comments like this. I found this to be a very helpful comment that contributed to the discussion, and found a neat editor in the process.

Thanks for sharing geyang, sorry for the downvoters, HN has a problem with downvoting (not the least of which is the inability to undo downvotes).

I'd guess that the rendering is done client side here and can be done with partial updates. ShareLaTeX and Overleaf have to do a full LaTeX pass on the server just to show the change of a small part of the document.

Try either MathJax or KaTeX from Khan Academy