That's like saying win the lottery. Sure, it could work, but it's a lot of risk and does not scale.
That's like saying win the lottery. Sure, it could work, but it's a lot of risk and does not scale.
Kids are a choice - but even with kids one can still live frugally or prepared. For example, choosing to not have a child until you've accumulated enough savings to cover all of the extra surprise costs that can occur that most people don't plan for when having a child.
My father worked two jobs to barely make ends meet for 8 years because his financial planning revolved around a family plan that he didn't actually plan for. My family plans are actually planned and revolve around my financial plans. One problem I see people make is that their financial plans revolve around their family plans (or lack thereof).
No surprise child at 18 years of age. No poorly-planned "I think I'm ready but I'm not actually ready" child at 21-23 either. I've seen very, very, very few parents under the age of 25 that a) planned for their child and more importantly b) properly planned for their child.
Lack of planning - or having a poorly crafted plan is what is "risky" or "doesn't scale".
In fact in TFA he says he has a kid.
fixed that for you :)
it's a lot of risk
What’s a lot of risk? Saving a significant portion of your income? Sounds less risky than “work until I’m 70 and then hope I have a good pension.”If something happens then finding a good job when your older and have not worked for a while is hard. So, IMO your better off trying to get a significantly larger nest egg than you think you need. That way compound interst works for you and you don't risk poverty while your old.