Tell HN: Submissions about Oracle's position on reverse engineering | Hacker News Reader

Tell HN: Submissions about Oracle's position on reverse engineering

9 pointsColinWright5 comments

So this has getting a lot of discussion, unsurprisingly, but the discussion is split across several submissions, each with its own slant. Here are the submissions I've found:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10039202
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10040428
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10041960
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10043030
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10043326

In a comment I'll put clickable links, with current counts.

View on HN

Clickable links, with domain name and comment counts:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10039202 (oracle.com) 517 pts, 277 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10040428 (archive.org) 338 pts, 107 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10041960 (seclists.org) 1 pt, no comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10043030 (archive.org) 7 pts, 3 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10043326 (zdnet.com) 1 pt, no comments

The "archive.org" submission is there because the original blog post has been removed.

They keep coming in:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10043718, (archive.org) 1 pt 2 comments {Deleted}

And, as someone else has said, still they come:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10044665

Why didn't a single one of these hit the front? Is someone messing with them? I only found out about this because other sites were reporting it.

At least two of them hit the front page, one of them staying there for quite some time:

http://hnrankings.info/10043718,10043326,10043030,10041960,1...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com