DigitalOcean Teams Up with Bitnami, Install Over 100 Web Apps with a Few Clicks
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
https://serverpilot.io/blog/2015/07/22/one-click-wordpress-a...
Our images do change some configuration options based on the type of instance that we detect on boot. It would be great if you could get in touch with us at hello@bitnami.com and let us know the details of what you had to configure manually, so that we can improve this.
Uh, I don't really understand what "Bitnami access" constitutes. Once I've done the install, I don't really need Bitnami for anything more, right? right? Does that mean everyone who wants to do a Bitnami-powered install should hurry up and do it now, before they have to pay to get access to the Bitnami installer?
The advantage with using containers as opposed to VMs is containers are portable so you are not stuck to any server or cloud provider. Your apps are portable, and cloning, snapshots and backups become simpler.
The advantage of using LXC is the entire stack can be in one container and the environment is more like an OS that users are familiar with. Users can use the flockport utility to pull the app and then directly get to the App dashboard, without all the installation and configuration hassles of a typical stack. And Flockport apps should work with nspawn and other container managers.
It comes bundled with a CLI installer, which would be trivial to utilize when automating the install process.
The winners are first the users, who have an easier way to install the app (it's already given away for free) and you, which are given another solid app to offer.
I don't really get anything by entering the app in a contest. I'm not really interested in contesting the app at all. But, to give your users more choice on what to use? Again a total win for you.
(I think they use affiliate links in that post, just FYI)
full configs are available on github (and more updated).
There are also a lot of other companies/packages to help you setup faster stacks that are more maintained than what I did. easyEngine or ServerPilot being two examples.
But, sure, you get exactly what you ask for.
On the other hand, I never had an issue with my OVH 2$ (now 5$) server, and I run an Apache with worpress, an IRC bouncer for a handful of users, a mumble, a teamspeak and a minecraft server on it. Less than 100% CPU and RAM utilization.
OVH isn’t cheap because they don’t deliver the performance you ask for, OVH is cheap because they really don’t provide anything else in the free tier, no backups, no additional IPs, no guarantueed uptime.
None of them are mission critical or have any impact on my income, so I used my server setup as a chance to teach myself how to setup nginx.
The sites were using the bitnami image on the free AWS tier before that. No issues there either.
Edit: It seems I need to register on Bitnami's website.
Generate the site, push to S3 or Azure, then put CloudFlare (or another CDN/Cache) in front of it... Easy peasy.
Same as literally every other application?
It's a blog. It doesn't need to be bulletproof or run on a cluster.
(Of course, the hip choice is Ghost.)
I eventually scrapped it and installed from source. Took a little longer to configure but worked out.
I also added some extra firewall and server monitoring tools.
perhaps someone is out to get you. never experienced this in my life. been running dedicated server with over a hundred installs for 2 years. sure you have script kiddies that might send a bot to try to brute force passwords. But Nginx can easily handle that load.
I think a lot of developers--myself included, for a long time--don't really appreciate why this is the reason WordPress is as popular as it is. The vast majority of the criticisms people make of WP are valid, but good luck finding something else as easy for a non-developer to not just install and configure, but to actually maintain in a relatively secure fashion. (I also don't think developers appreciate how good modern WordPress is as this -- not to say that it's perfect, by any stretch, but once it's set up correctly the damn thing is self-updating. As long as you stick to popular, actively-developed plugins and put effort into keeping them updated -- which is frankly a pretty low bar, since it's about three clicks on the dashboard -- WordPress isn't likely to be a serious security concern.
I don't see how WordPress's general audience would be in the least concerned about its failure to be a "twelve-factor app," do you?
well , it's all about context. I don't see the general audience using digital audience to deploy applications.
So I have nothing against wordpress really , it's not just adapted for modern deployment techniques.
@All if anyone have any questions about EasyEngine, I will be happy to answer. I am from EasyEngine team. :-)
Think of it as Cloudformation for the rest of the world !