Imagine blocking anyone called "John Williams" and then claiming you were blocking terrorists, not just people with English-sounding names.
It turns out that in practice (and law), companies are held responsible for grossly discriminatory effects of their actions, without a detailed process of examining motivations at the time.
Oops, no, our wonderful, benevolent, and omniscient government is one step ahead of the curve as usual. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17073-2004Aug...
If you want to blame anyone, blame the U.S. agencies who implemented these restrictions. Sophos is just obeying the law.
Those who are modding you down have no clue how the various government lists work, and what the penalties are for exporting anything to someone on them.
Yes, as with most US export law, these lists are arbitrary, feckless, and generally stupid, and yes, they contain a lot of very common names. But the "Muslim"-ness of the name has absolutely nothing to do with anything. (Exactly what is a "Muslim" name, anyway? Am I a Christian because my name is John?)
Americans are not allowed to trade with people on the SDN even if they live in America and are American citizens:
http://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/salah-v-us-d...
His statement is not wrong. He is caught up in this net because the US Government is waging various kinds of economic warfare against Muslim countries, and one of their tools is literally just a list of names. If USG didn't hate Iran or view the Middle East as a strategic interest, there would not be so many Muslim names on the list and this probably wouldn't have happened to him.