Even lynx is not immune:
http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-5836/...
Not close to true. There are hundreds of browsers out there. I used Surf[0] and Xombrero[1] for a number of years.
https://www.google.com/webhp?q=%22chrome+is+the+new+IE%22
Safari and Firefox is typically called the new IE because they are lagging behind the times.
Which is why I said "IE6" in my original comment. The later versions of IE were very decent. They certainly didn't seem like the frozen accident of history - an issue Firefox continues to grapple with.
That's a reasonable criticism of Safari, which is updated infrequently and is lagging on all sorts of web standards, but not for Firefox.
That really is nonsense. Firefox is standards-compliant; it's multi-platform; and it works.
I have major issues with its direction (the gelding of its sync service was particularly galling), but it's still the best browser out there.
All the same, as of 2015, it is a poor implementation of a browser from the technical point of view. Not because it was designed badly, but because it has simply not kept up.
How has it not kept up?