But I find it strange that the women are apparently such willing participants. If they don't want to get dick pics from the "fuckboys" (as the article calls them), why are they hanging out online with these people?
With it "smart" people, don't have to feel responsible for what they get "dumb" people to do.
hanging out, in some cases, for twenty hours a day, according to the article.
Everybody constantly gets evaluated in two seconds. Mates very nearly are commodities. People claiming otherwise are just uggos, or class-ists.
Once we get video of some interaction + voice + smell, that's really 99% of the mating game. Nobody really gives a shit about anybody's resume. They may claim to when asked, but in reality we're dealing with systems much lower down towards the cerebellum.
Thinking caps come in a range of fashion colors.
"When you meet somebody for the first time, you're not meeting them. You're meeting their representative."
The women on Tinder, and every other online dating site, they don't all want dick pics. It does get annoying. But, they still like to feel desired, and getting a bunch of responses from men validates that a woman is still sexually viable, attractive, and that men want her. You can say that it's a confidence booster.
Sex and sexuality are ultimately about power. People who have high sexual value can totally let that power get to their heads and start taking advantage of others. This isn't gender-specific, but simply the way the world works.
This article is super one-sided and makes it sound like all these women in New York have no choice but to be on Tinder. Can't have it both ways.