Hacker News Reader

My first reaction when I've read your comment was that it has to be because of sub-strings but as std::vector allocates memory again anyway that can't be too important. Can you elaborate a bit? I am not a C++ programmer but I am sometimes curious so maybe I am missing something obvious.

View on HN

I wad confused too but looking at the definition of realloc, it will sometimes allocate adjacent memory and sometimes allocate new memory and perform a move. In which case copying the std::string values might not be valid.

Well, but std::vector always performs a move so any pointers to sub-strings won't be valid anyway from what I understand. I am probably just not getting something but it really seems like it should just use realloc. Maybe it has something to do with thread safety though as I don't think there are any guarantees for realloc.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com