'For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.' - Richard P. Feynman [1] [1] - http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/roger...
http://paulromer.net/stigler-conviction-vs-feynman-integrity...
That ship has sailed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Ric...
Now, because we aren't (intrinsically) proponents of either, we qualify both so as to distinguish them. Either way, the renamed title is far better. "Feynman's concept of scientific integrity". Excellent title.
On a more important note, this approach of being the greatest critic of your ideas is probably a phenomenal way to make fault-tolerant software (not necessarily accounting for every eventuality, but being aware of as many as possible, and appropriately choosing to handle or not to handle them). I'm not nearly as good at it as I'd like to be.
And perhaps it is, but if not, it makes sense to call these specific requirements that Feynman came up with "Feynman Integrity".